Frontpage
Green accounts
workshop
Benchmarks and indicators
Indicators for green accounts
Chemicals
Anchorage
Auditing
Dissemination
 
Search site for:
Here you can see and download the Dogmehandbook, which is the mainresult of the Dogme-Lifeproject:
Dogme Handbook
Dogme 2000OrganisationPublicationsContactDanish

Testplan indicators for green accounts

 

Indicator/Municipality. The number of actual benchmarks for the areas is stated in brackets

Albertslund

Ballerup

Fredericia

Herning

Copenhagen

Kolding

Malmø

 

Soil and groundwater (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Average content of problematic substances in the wells of the common waterworks

X

X

 

X

X

 

 

2

Number of wells (common waterworks) where the limit value for problematic substances has been exceeded. Alternatively: number of wells where the content of problematic substances is at 25 %, 50 % or at an exceedance of the current limit value.

X

X

 

X

X

 

 

3

Summer water flow in water courses

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

4

Amount of contaminated soil disposed of

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

Nature (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

Surface of green/blue areas (broken down in three categories) and in % of total surface of municipality

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

6

Distance from dwellings to green areas (within the three categories)

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

7

Visibility depth measured from boat in a deep spot from bridge or similar

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

8

Share of green areas that is managed without the use of chemical pesticides and fertiliser (within the three categories). Share of nature (category 1) managed with grazing of animals

 

X

X

 

X

 

 

 

Chemicals (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 9

Contents of NPE, PFOS*, DEHP and Hg in inlet to wastewater treatment plant

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

10

Municipal procurement of eco-labelled products

 

X

X

 

X

 

 

11

Municipal procurement of organic products

X

X

X

X

X

 

 

12

Share of farms/km2 agricultural land cultivated traditionally/organically

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

13

Share of private households/private enterprises/housing associations in the municipality using pesticides (chemical herbicides).

 

X

X

X

 

X

 

 

 

Indicator/Municipality

Albertslund

Ballerup

Fredericia

Herning

Copenhagen

Kolding

Malmø

 

Waste (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

Environmental impact from waste per capita

X

X

 

X

X

 

 

 

Energy (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

CO2 emissions from electricity and heat consumption distributed on sectors: households, public/municipal buildings, industry/commerce.

 

X

X

 

X

 

 

16

CO2 emissions from road traffic in the municipality

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

Air (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

Contents in air of NO2 and particles (pm10)

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

18

Emissions of NOX from energy consumption (dwellings, industry and transport)

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

Noise (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

Number of dwellings and residents in dwellings exposed to noise impacts from road traffic, rail traffic, air traffic and industry (stated in dB intervals).

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

20

Noise impact in the public space in the city

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

Planning (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

Number of local plans for administrative businesses that are not located near the station

 

X

X

 

X

 

 

22

Surface in rural zone designated for residential purposes in the municipal plan

 

X

X

 

X

 

 

 

Anchorage (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

How many activities has the municipality initiated for the residents?

X

 

 

X

X

 

 

24

How many activities has the municipality initiated for industry and commerce?

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

25

How many activities has the municipality initiated for for its own institutions?

X

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

#Total number of benchmarks is 15.    

 Sum of tests for each municipality à

11

13

10

11

23